3 ms·
Also, X and Y in this case are (mostly) mutually exclusive. We just don't have a common catchall term for technical non-ICs to be able to express a positive req
by webmaven 8y ago
Also, X and Y in this case are (mostly) mutually exclusive. We just don't have a common catchall term for technical non-ICs to be able to express a positive requirement without also including non-technical managers.
- RangerScience 8y agoI can't identify the case you're talking about. Seems like the problem is trying to have a category (as in folder, as in old school email) rather than a label. "Technically capable", "contributor", and "technical contributor" all sound like ways to positively express "not looking for non-technical managers". The problem comes back around to "do not restrict people to the categories you assign to them". (Which is also a way to phrase many social justice issues and IMO where "being a cog in a machine" comes from).