2 ms·
>And in my world-view, if an individual can't rightfully do something, then neither can a group of individuals, no matter how largebased organization. This is
by nickthemagicman 8y ago
>And in my world-view, if an individual can't rightfully do something, then neither can a group of individuals, no matter how largebased organization.
This is interesting idea. Do you have any examples of this incorrectly applied in modern times?
At it's core the law takes away the permission to apply violence from your average person and puts it in the hands of supposedly fair/blind judges.
From Bastiat:
"It is the substitution of a common force for individual forces. And this common force is to do only what the individual forces have a natural and lawful right to do: to protect persons, liberties, and properties; to maintain the right of each, and to cause justice to reign over us all."
So ultimately were making the same point I think about protection of property?
You feel like the govt has crossed a boundary somewhere though and I'm curious where.
- scotty79 8y ago> Do you have any examples of this incorrectly applied in modern times? Not sure about "rightfully" but groups of people are definitely treated more leniently as to what they can do. Individual when he kills more than 20 people usually doesn't get away with just a fine like GM did.