4 ms·
To be a bit more accurate, the judge’s decision was only on a motion to dismiss. So, he didn’t actually decide that there was a contract, he decided that if you
by bdowling 8y ago
To be a bit more accurate, the judge’s decision was only on a motion to dismiss. So, he didn’t actually decide that there was a contract, he decided that if you assume that plaintiff’s assertions are true, then there could have been a contract. That allows the case to continue.
- slavik81 8y agoThe other linked case, MedioStream v. Microsoft, doesn't seem to be based on any other offer. It's also a denial of a motion to dismiss, though.