> with Latin-1 you're shooting yourself in both feet Can you be more specific about that? As I wrote in a sibling comment, I'm not convinced. I mean, nowadays

> with Latin-1 you're shooting yourself in both feet Can you be more specific about that? As I wrote in a sibling comment, I'm not convinced. I mean, nowadays you shouldn't use any of the ISO-8859-* encodings anymore of course, but we're talking about the 1990s here.