> AFAK, it still lacks support for parallelism / multicore programming. Yeah this is a deal-breaker. And it's kinda weird that the article is pitching Crystal

> AFAK, it still lacks support for parallelism / multicore programming. Yeah this is a deal-breaker. And it's kinda weird that the article is pitching Crystal as a replacement for Go, Elixir, and Rust with that kind of limitation. I guess this is just the ramp-up into one more trip around the giant ferris-wheel that is language popularity cycles.