3 ms·
I'd say that Wirth himself was/is more a fan of the "80%" part than the "Rust" part, as making things fool-proof would complicate language design and implementa
by mhd 8y ago
I'd say that Wirth himself was/is more a fan of the "80%" part than the "Rust" part, as making things fool-proof would complicate language design and implementation too much, with all the follow-up effects this has.
I can't think of anything "modern" that comes close to that, most languages these days are quite feature sink-y. And yes, that includes Go, if we consider Oberon to be somewhat of a baseline.
Heck, even his successor's language (Eiffel) is more minimal than what's hip these days.
- noir_lord 8y agoBack when I was learning programming as a kid I read a quote in a pascal book > Pascal generally has one way to do a thing, the right way. Right up through Object Pascal I always felt that was the case and in 2018 it's only now that VS2017 feels nearly as productive as Delphi 6 did nearly 20 years ago.