4 ms·
The difference is Psystar: 1) Was kind of a scam 2) Sold computers with OS X already installed 2 is the real violation that got them sued. Obviously it's leg
by PeCaN 8y ago
The difference is Psystar:
1) Was kind of a scam
2) Sold computers with OS X already installed
2 is the real violation that got them sued. Obviously it's legal to sell computers that are compatible with OS X. Selling them with OS X installed in violation of Apple's EULA is a good way to end up in court.
- bdcravens 8y agoI literally acknowledged this point: > Obviously if a company isn't selling product with OSX installed it's different > Obviously it's legal to sell computers that are compatible with OS X Never said it wasn't. Only that most companies wouldn't market their product's alternative illegal uses, as that puts them in a gray area. (Almost every product can be used for illegal purposes after all)