3 ms·
Lisp doesn't have any way to define those FP constructs and it's one of the first functional programming languages ever. I think you're being misled by Haskell.
by jvican 8y ago
Lisp doesn't have any way to define those FP constructs and it's one of the first functional programming languages ever. I think you're being misled by Haskell.
- AzzieElbab 8y agoI can't argue about Lisp. For better or worse scala fp programmers are more inspired by Haskell. Scalaz was basically an attempt to port all of Haskell to Scala, 1 to 1