4 ms·
That's not what Tachyons is. The people who made it and those who advocate Functional CSS (Tachyons, Tailwind, Atomic CSS etc.) have a clear idea what HTML < 5
by jasim 8y ago
That's not what Tachyons is. The people who made it and those who advocate Functional CSS (Tachyons, Tailwind, Atomic CSS etc.) have a clear idea what HTML < 5 used to be, what inline css is, why BEM and SMACSS exist, what js-in-css is, and in general know what they're doing.
I'm saying that to help apply a principle of charity when evaluating this idea that on first blush looks like insanity. But there is something in there.
Readings to get started: https://johnpolacek.github.io/the-case-for-atomic-css/ https://johnpolacek.github.io/the-case-for-atomic-css/
- deltron3030 8y agoWhy not go one step further (like Style Elements in Elm), and reduce CSS & HTML to layout and style? https://mdgriffith.gitbooks.io/style-elements/content/ https://mdgriffith.gitbooks.io/style-elements/content/ Accessibility is often mentioned when it comes to the separation of concerns between HTML layout and CSS layout, but why would somebody try to adress blind people differently when it comes to semantics and hierachy? Wouldn't you want the same experience as seeing people?
- habitue 8y agoOk, that's interesting. I guess I am out of the loop on this one