4 ms·
Do we need an anonymous but authenticated web of trust system for analyzing/debunking papers? Is it apparent to those in the field that these results are low qu
by nerpderp83 8y ago
Do we need an anonymous but authenticated web of trust system for analyzing/debunking papers? Is it apparent to those in the field that these results are low quality / junk science?
How does one detect junk science paper other than being skilled enough to have produced the bad science if the first place?
- stenl 8y agoIt’s definitely apparent to those in the field. All the good scientists know who publishes junk, even if the junk publishers are unaware. Arjun Raj has a great and relevant blog post on playing the long game in science: http://rajlaboratory.blogspot.com/2016/06/reproducibility-reputation-and-playing.html?m=1 http://rajlaboratory.blogspot.com/2016/06/reproducibility-re.... Worth a read.