2 ms·
This is pretty much my perspective too, and why I'm very hesitant to declare religion the 'obvious' root of so many problems, and its decline a solution/victory
by mercer 8y ago
This is pretty much my perspective too, and why I'm very hesitant to declare religion the 'obvious' root of so many problems, and its decline a solution/victory, despite the fact that I'm pretty much an atheist myself too.
EDIT: "Chesterton's Fence" comes to mind.
- trashtester 8y agoYes, its basically the same principle. Though I think we can never truely understand all aspects of society, just like you probably can't simultaneously understand everything that happens within a modern computer. Even if you have the IQ you don't have the time and capacity. So in practice, I think we are left to make incremental attempts at improvements, while trying to make changes both small and reversible. In computer science terms, this is gradient decent. It may not allow us to reach all global minima, but it is much more likely to lead to a good place than large semi-random changes.