I agree with the general point of the article, though the main compare/contrast of different code review scenarios seems to speak more about deadlines for code

I agree with the general point of the article, though the main compare/contrast of different code review scenarios seems to speak more about deadlines for code reviews than code ownership. Where I work we just expect multi-day turnaround times on most PRs so that the reviewer can schedule it however they see fit, and that does more to relieve code review stress than anything else. Assigning PRs to code "owners" just seems like common sense to me, and is built in to github now.