4 ms·
I found ScriptSafe a lot easier to use on Chrome, didn't realise Firefox had one too. What are your thoughts on ScriptSafe vs. NoScript + uMatrix?
by fraudsyndrome 8y ago
I found ScriptSafe a lot easier to use on Chrome, didn't realise Firefox had one too. What are your thoughts on ScriptSafe vs. NoScript + uMatrix?
- codingowl 8y agoScriptSafe is light years better and easier IMHO than NoScript. NS tends to break most sites, whereas SS doesn't.
- woodrowbarlow 8y agoisn't it a little bit naive to pump all of your internet traffic through a browser created by google if you're interested in restricting online tracking by corporations like google?
- fraudsyndrome 8y agoOoh I should have provided more context. I only use Chrome for development and when I can't for the life of me figure out which addon in firefox is breaking the page. FWIW, I still use SS on chrome, now that firefox has SS I can hopefully just use purely FF for browsing and just have a different profile with minimal addons. I'd still have to have chrome for development though.
- BlackjackCF 8y agoWhat's funny is I've been using Chrome heavily for development, but I'm moving more and more towards Firefox. Not sure why, but Chrome has been chugging really hard on loading GitHub PRs for me, whereas it's smooth as butter on FF...