5 ms·
Tesla is held to a different standard is precisely because they have been so forthcoming in the past. If a company is giving regular updates on production and
by daveguy 8y ago
Tesla is held to a different standard is precisely because they have been so forthcoming in the past.
If a company is giving regular updates on production and targets and then gets weird about it for one meeting then you can expect a drop. It looks like they are back on track (and are again open about production), but you can bet if they get cagey about it again their stock is going to take a hit. They might be able to transition to less openness if they want to (so they only reveal what they want and don't spook investors), but not one extreme to the other in just one shareholders meeting.
- cptskippy 8y agoSeems like a great way to make money. Train everyone to be weary if you're cagey answering questions. 1) Short your stock. 2) Hold press event. 3) Get cagey about questions. 4) Profit.
- dragonwriter 8y agoAnd that is a perfect example of why corporate management and other insiders are subject to all kinds of restriction on trading their company’s stock.
- cptskippy 8y agoThat's only if they give false or misleading statements or trading on non-publicly disclosed information. Does it count if you intentionally manipulate your body language or tone in intentionally misleading ways while still presenting factual and correct information? For example giving an uncharacteristic pregnant pause when answering a straight forward question or becoming agitated when normally you're subdue?
- njarboe 8y agoI think the reason Musk and Tesla are very sensitive about production numbers right now is that they want to hit their 200k electric car production number at just the right time. The way the $7500 federal tax credit works (and I am pretty certain this is right. Happy to follow a link to the actual law) is that after a company makes 200k qualifying vehicles, for the rest of that quarter and the quarter after that people still get the tax credit. So depending on when they hit the 200,000th car, the full tax credit will last between 3 and 6 months. Tesla would like to get the Model 3 production ramped up to a high level but not hit the 200k total production until right after the start of a quarter. It looks like they are going to do just that. Tesla is very close to 200k this month and that is probably partly why they shut down to "improve production rate". Slow down production in June to not hit 200k until after July 1. They have also been playing with exporting more cars to hit the 200k number at just the right time. Having the maximum 6 months instead of the minimum 3 months will be a lot of extra cars/people getting the tax credit. If they average 6000 cars a week over that time (12 weeks x 6000 x $7500) that is an extra $540 million. Then the tax credit goes in half for the next two quarters and in half again ($7500/4) for the next 2 quarters. Seems a bit strange for the law not just to say the credit extends for 6 months after the 200,000th car is built, but who knows how such laws get crafted.
- cjhopman 8y agoYour whole premise is wrong. The credit's expiration is based on # of cars sold for use in the US. Not, in any way, on # of cars built.
- njarboe 8y agoYou are right. I knew that as seen in my reference to selling cars overseas. I should have said sold domestically not built.
- toast0 8y agoIt's not a direct link, but it's pretty close. You can't sell cars that aren't built, and if they're built, you want to sell them ASAP so you don't have to deal with inventory. That you can sell them to other countries helps with the inventory issue though.
- cjhopman 8y ago> and I am pretty certain this is right. Happy to follow a link to the actual law it's not: https://www.irs.gov/irb/2009-48_IRB https://www.irs.gov/irb/2009-48_IRB
- njarboe 8y agoThanks for the link. My basic understanding is correct, I believe, but should have said "sold in the US" rather than built. Since it is a US tax credit, I just assumed it was for cars people in the US bought and didn't include the cars not sold in the US. I wonder what that fraction might be. From a page linked on the page you gave: "The new qualified plug-in electric drive motor vehicle credit phases out for a manufacturer’s vehicles over the one-year period beginning with the second calendar quarter after the calendar quarter in which at least 200,000 qualifying vehicles manufactured by that manufacturer have been sold for use in the United States (determined on a cumulative basis for sales after December 31, 2009) (“phase-out period”). Qualifying vehicles manufactured by that manufacturer are eligible for 50 percent of the credit if acquired in the first two quarters of the phase-out period and 25 percent of the credit if acquired in the third or fourth quarter of the phase-out period. Vehicles manufactured by that manufacturer are not eligible for a credit if acquired after the phase-out period." I believe this somewhat convoluted language says the same thing I did. The phase out lasts a year. 50% for the first 6 months and 25% for the next 6 months. This starts after the end of the first full quarter after the quarter where the domestic sales are greater than 200k (ie, between 3 and 6 months after 200k sold).