3 ms·
Maybe they should have sold a share rather than leasing it? If a user owns an antenna and views their own stream, that's a private performance.
by darkarmani 8y ago
Maybe they should have sold a share rather than leasing it? If a user owns an antenna and views their own stream, that's a private performance.
- acjohnson55 8y agoYeah, that would be an interesting twist. My guess is the RF tech is a lot easier to deploy when you can plan for some percentile of peak utilization, rather than 1:1 with the user base. Even then, they'd undoubtedly face legal challenges, so they must have made the judgment call that the odds were on their side. Which may have been a reasonable conclusion. A lot of the judgments were actually on their side until the circuit split and the final Supreme Court decision. After all, one wouldn't imaging that leasing an old-school aerial antenna would be a legal issue. It was a hot topic on HN several years back. I may be biased, as my wife did PR for Aereo through the firm she works for. But I definitely buy the logic that what they were doing was technical a private performance.