5 ms·
Bitcoin could go the way of any number of other cyptos; back to zero. In any case, nobody uses Bitcoin as a currency because it's logistically harder for 99.9%
by ComradeTaco 8y ago
Bitcoin could go the way of any number of other cyptos; back to zero.
In any case, nobody uses Bitcoin as a currency because it's logistically harder for 99.9% of people, and nobody uses it as a store of value because its insanely volitale. Bitcoin is really just a speculative asset.
- davnicwil 8y agoNobody uses Linux as an operating system because it's logistically harder for 99.9% of people. It's still incredibly important and foundational, and will continue to be, even supposing this never changes, even if that same 99.9% of people never know what it is. Nobody used the Internet in its early days because it was logistically hard for 99.9% of people. However it made completely new things possible and over time, companies figured out how to make it not logistically hard to use for the majority of people, who enjoyed these new possibilities without having to worry about the complexity of the system underneath.
- solotronics 8y agoActually everone uses it and you don`t even realize. Cellphones are all linux/bsd derivitives. All financial transactions will eventually be on a cyptocurrency but maybe nobody will realize it.
- davnicwil 8y agoThis is exactly the point I was attempting to make :-) Probably not all that clearly though, thanks for clarifying it a bit.
- vidarh 8y agoI just made a transfer to someone just yesterday that had never dealt with Bitcoin before. Beyond explaining why "confirmations" were needed, it was surprisingly simple to get a total beginner set up with an account somewhere suitable, and even though I was transferring from an exchange account where I had to get verified (the account predated new KYC requirements), it tooks ~10 minutes to complete the verification process. So it may be logistically harder, but it's doable enough that it was worth it to avoid having to do an international wire transfer with banks in many cases still stuck in a world of paper and faxes (my bank manager actually boasted about the amount of manual, paper-based back and forth setting up my business account required when I opened it two years ago).
- gomox 8y agoI recently helped a techy friend with this and there were a number of pitfalls when dealing with the addresses and the long confirmation timed. The UTXOs abstraction is super unintuitive. Ethereum's account system is much simpler. Still eithet are a piece of cake and lightning fast compared to normal banks.
- mr_spothawk 8y agoI know people who use Bitcoin as a currency.
- lazyasciiart 8y agoI know people who use 'hours of babysitting' as a currency too.
- anm89 8y agoI know someone who uses their nobel prize as a kind of currency. I'm more impressed by the guy who managed to figure out how to transact in bitcoin.
- scj 8y agoI haven't used Bitcoin, and from what I've read I have two questions about it being a currency: If I attempted to buy an ice cream cone with Bitcoin, will the money be transferred before the ice cream melts? What costs more, the transaction fees or the ice cream cone?
- ComradeTaco 8y ago> If I attempted to buy an ice cream cone with Bitcoin, will the money be transferred before the ice cream melts? It will not. >What costs more, the transaction fees or the ice cream cone? There have been times where the average transaction cost was about $20. It's hovering around $0.80 cents now, to the best of my knowledge. So it depends on the market. I belief that the current strategy is to convince others that bitcoin is a great transaction medium for everything under the sun (i.e. ice cream) and then cash out in dirty fiat once the price reaches a target so you can buy Lambos full of ice cream. It's really not a sincere attempt to create a currency as it is to masssively enrich early adopters by encouraging use by normal people.
- stcredzero 8y ago"It's really not a sincere attempt to create [X] as it is to masssively enrich early adopters by encouraging use by normal people." So it's basically a trash startup.
- sireat 8y agoBitcoin as a great transaction medium WAS the strategy in the early years. This was the big promise. As price and transaction fees rose the transaction medium for everyday things(like me paying for Namecheap hosting/domains in BTC in 2013) went away. Many big vendors such as Steam actually stopped accepting BTC directly(or through 1 step processor such as Bitpay). It was too much trouble/risk and annoyed customers. Cheaper/safer/more convenient than bank transfers. That Bitcoin promise has not been fulfilled. SEPA is way cheaper/more convenient/safer than Bitcoin in Europe. Even in countries with troubled banking systems such as Venezuela, it is not normal to pay for regular items with BTC. So Bitcoin "pivoted" to store-of-value strategy. Promise that offchain solutions like LN will handle transactions "any day now". Hilariously Bitcoin.org just put back the low-fees part. https://news.bitcoin.com/bitcoin-org-reverts-back-to-fast-and-low-fee-descriptions-on-front-page/ https://news.bitcoin.com/bitcoin-org-reverts-back-to-fast-an...
- arisAlexis 8y agocan you back your claims? cause billions of dollars are stored as value and many people including me use it to buy stuff.