4 ms·
So I think “pile of trash” might be a bit too far, but JavaScript is a weird choice for one major reason: most languages have several objective technical and st
by cirgue 8y ago
So I think “pile of trash” might be a bit too far, but JavaScript is a weird choice for one major reason: most languages have several objective technical and strategiec advantages. JavaScript has exactly two: it is the only language available in a browser, and it is on a large number of people’s resumes. There is no technical dimension of JavaScript that makes it the best choice for any task outside the browser, and the commonality advantage is shared by many other languages. If anyone has a good counter argument, I would love to hear it. I’m not saying that to be snarky, I genuinely want to hear perspectives in defense of JS other than “well it’s a good language because so many people use it and it’s better than it used to be”
- always_good 8y ago>There is no technical dimension of JavaScript that makes it the best choice for any task outside the browser Seriously? How about async-everything?
- FridgeSeal 8y agoJS is not the only language with async capabilities. Any number of other mature languages have async (and parallel, unlike JS) tools available.