The way the article's written, it's putting much more emphasis on the slight and sporadic outperformance of boys in math, rather than on the much stronger and m

The way the article's written, it's putting much more emphasis on the slight and sporadic outperformance of boys in math, rather than on the much stronger and more consistend outperformance of girls in language. That's the problem with the agenda, IMO. Edit: as mlthoughts2018 points out, the title could as well be: "Boys, increasingly abandoned in English class, turn to math as a domain in which they can be rewarded for success-- especially in rich, white suburbs."