Are you objecting to the article because you feel the title is misleading (i.e. it actually does contain math), or because you don't think MCMC can be explained

Are you objecting to the article because you feel the title is misleading (i.e. it actually does contain math), or because you don't think MCMC can be explained without math? I actually felt it was a halfway decent description of MCMC, but I could see criticisms from both perspectives above.