> https://arxiv.org/abs/1602.01497 https://arxiv.org/abs/1602.01497 Note that this is in the "history and philosophy of physics" section of the arXiv, so it's

> https://arxiv.org/abs/1602.01497 https://arxiv.org/abs/1602.01497 Note that this is in the "history and philosophy of physics" section of the arXiv, so it's not flooding the arXiv in general. I've heard a small handful of practical physicists complain that Ginsin is getting too much status by posting on the arXiv, but I haven't heard any philosophers of science complain that his papers are particularly bad, much less that they are so obviously worthless that they are a net negative due to taking up space on the daily list of what's new in that section.