3 ms·
>> The problem with your standard of saying nothing is illegal till a court rules on it, is we require someone accuse another to trigger the court determination
by icelancer 8y ago
>> The problem with your standard of saying nothing is illegal till a court rules on it, is we require someone accuse another to trigger the court determination of fact.
As someone who is involved in multiple IP lawsuits and one other major civil matter, this is exactly how it works. I don't claim people are doing illegal things. I am filing lawsuits against them alleging improper behavior and I let the courts do their job, which is determining legality and harm to parties.
Laymen don't get to decide what is or isn't legal, nor is it a wise decision to accuse people of illegal activities when no fact finding group has found that to be true. Trust me on this one when I say courts really, really don't appreciate that kind of language.
- MrLeap 8y agoCertain contexts DO allow Laymen authority to determine the legality of things. Juries and voting come immediately to mind. Conversationally, saying "I think this is illegal" instead of "this is illegal" freely surrenders to those who disagree with you to use appeals to authority to bypass conversation without addressing what you said. I think this is a bad strategy if you're levying a case in the e-court of e-opinions.
- jfoutz 8y ago> involved in multiple IP lawsuits and one other major civil matter sounds like breach of contract, not crimes though. shrug
- icelancer 8y agoIf it was purely civil, I would have said that. It's not.
- jacquesm 8y agoBut this is an online forum, not a court.
- icelancer 8y agoAs many people find out the hard way, online forums become part of court proceedings rather easily through the miracles of discovery.