5 ms·
I would have preferred promulgating a set of standards to be GDPR compliant, and allowing companies the option to choose whether to conform. Individuals in turn
by yasp 8y ago
I would have preferred promulgating a set of standards to be GDPR compliant, and allowing companies the option to choose whether to conform. Individuals in turn could choose whether to use GPDR compliant services or not. Rather than hitting all companies globally over the head with a hammer. Eventually this strategy of legislative aggression is going to blow up in the EU's face.
- sandworm101 8y agoThat's the argument for why health codes should be optional, that customers can choose whether or nor to eat in dirty restaurants and the market will settle the issue. Nope. I don't want to play that game. I want everyone to obey a mandatory set of minimum rules. It's about information imbalance. Without mandatory minimums it is too easy for businesses to hide faults from consumers. I don't want websites to use business judgment when deciding whether to protect consumer privacy. I want them to fear massive retaliatory fines should they not do the bare minimum necessary to protect the public from harm.
- frockington 8y ago"I want them to fear massive retaliatory fines " is exactly why America/Asia is currently dominating Europe in technology. No start up and innovation can happen in such an outwardly hostile business environment
- yifanl 8y agoNo startup or innovation should happen at the cost of harming the userbase.
- yasp 8y agoUltimately it comes down to whether a user should be free to choose whether to use such a service. Ostensibly the user is receiving some benefit despite this "harm". If the harm outweighed the benefit there would be no user.
- kodablah 8y agoYou can take the good with the bad or have neither in some idealistic world where only one exists. You can even limit the bad (oftentimes limiting the good as well), but you shouldn't say in absolute terms that innovation with some bad should never occur even if there is significant good.
- friedman23 8y ago"harm"
- bitwize 8y agoAbsolutely not. GDPR is the kind of thing that should have been passed worldwide 20 years ago. If companies will not respect your data and your privacy, they deserve to be punished severely.
- friedman23 8y agoIt's amazing how clueless some people are about the damage that regulation that isn't well thought out can cause to small businesses. GDPR isn't a well thought out regulation because the regulators couldn't even take the time to give examples of how to to migrate common internet infrastructure in order to be compliant. Instead they just threw out their shitty law and told the world to figure it out. This new link tax further proves to me that the bureaucrats in the EU have no idea what they are doing and have no technical knowledge.
- 456hdsaq234g 8y agoJust because you are small, doesn't mean you get to abuse user data. No, parent is right, this is long overdue, and if a few data abusers must pay, so be it. Its too important to make exclusions for those that cannot keep up. If you can't stand the heat, get out of the kitchen.
- rnd0 8y ago>If you can't stand the heat, get out of the kitchen. And that is the goal, isn't it? To drive out smaller competitors from online spaces so that only the big boys can play.
- wool_gather 8y agoIt's amazing how clueless some people are about the damage that software that isn't well thought out can cause to its users. ${SOCIAL_NETWORK} isn't a well thought out business because the owners couldn't even take the time to consider common privacy expectations in order to respect their customers. Instead they just threw out their shitty service and told the world to figure it out. This new practice of blocking EU users further proves to me that the execs in ${SOCIAL_NETWORK} have no idea what they're doing and have no good intentions.
- dmitriid 8y ago> I would have preferred promulgating a set of standards to be GDPR compliant, and allowing companies the option to choose whether to conform. EU countries had data protection laws for years before GDPR. Moreover, GDPR is only partially more strict than the existing Swedish data protection laws. I cannot name a single company that gave a damn about these laws. That's why GDPR, even with all it's ambiguities, is a good thing.