I like your definition of "look". I was going with where a dart* would land (100% of the time it will "really" hit a point that can't be expressed using comput

I like your definition of "look". I was going with where a dart* would land (100% of the time it will "really" hit a point that can't be expressed using computable numbers), but you're using it to mean anything we can compute or express. That is, if we're looking somewhere, it has to be somewhere we can say that we're looking, and therefore expressible. If we take your meaning, then yeah, that's what I mean as well :) * (Yes, the dart is an abstract one. No comments about the Planck length, please)