3 ms·
If you give them Restricted Stock, though, they have to pay tax on whatever the 409(a) value is -- which is what the strike price would have been with options.
by kentonv 8y ago
If you give them Restricted Stock, though, they have to pay tax on whatever the 409(a) value is -- which is what the strike price would have been with options.
You can give them a signing bonus to cover the tax, but at this point it's easier and actually better for the employee to give them the cash separately and say "you can use it to exercise if you like".
Really the difference between options and Restricted Stock is measurable in dollars, so might as well just give people the dollars.
(Note that Restricted Stock is not quite the same thing as Restricted Stock Units (RSUs)... RSUs are for later stage companies. But the principles are similar.)
- sidlls 8y agoSure; point being that employees ought not have to pay for their equity, because then it's not really compensation.
- cimmanom 8y agoYup, all the options for granting non-founder equity are absolutely awful from an employee POV. Maybe YC could lobby for a sane way to grant equity to early employees without penalizing the employee?