3 ms·
This took me down the rabbit-hole of the author's website, mindsports.nl, which has a number of interesting problems in puzzles and games. I was particularly pi
by pierrec 8y ago
This took me down the rabbit-hole of the author's website, mindsports.nl, which has a number of interesting problems in puzzles and games. I was particularly piqued by the China Labyrinth and related family of puzzles:
http://www.mindsports.nl/index.php/puzzles/tilings/china-labyrinth/ http://www.mindsports.nl/index.php/puzzles/tilings/china-lab...
It will be more difficult to sleep now that I know nobody has answered the question: "Why do both known 16x16 solutions to the Octopuszle feature the same diagonal complex?"
- bdr 8y agoThanks for the pointer, this page is really cool. It looks like someone here found a different Octopuszle solution: http://forums.xkcd.com/viewtopic.php?t=99760 http://forums.xkcd.com/viewtopic.php?t=99760 Looking at the four corners of the solutions on mindsports.nl, the pieces are nearly identical, and in particular the diagonals are identical. It makes sense that the two hand-solvers would use this symmetrical configuration. The programmatically found solution has different corners. Still, that amount of constraint is surprising. It would be a nice surprise if that corner symmetry could be proven to determine the diagonal complex.