4 ms·

First thing first: I would hope that "Git" would be removed from the GitPub name. I'm in favor of replacing Git in the process and having both a new client sour

by mikece 8y ago

First thing first: I would hope that "Git" would be removed from the GitPub name. I'm in favor of replacing Git in the process and having both a new client source control implementation and server API set (SourcePub?) that are designed with each other in mind, eases federation, and is both powerful and easier for new devs than Git (Hg managed this... not sure why a Git replacement can't do the same).

deleted 8y ago
[deleted]
Arkanosis 8y ago
GitPub (or whatever it'll be named then) does not intend to replace git or any other VCS. Its stated goal is to enable federation between services such as GitHub, GitLab, Gogs, Gitea, Pagure… which happen to use git. In other words, it means that if GitPub was adopted by these services, you could submit a merge request from Pagure to Gitlab, or star a GitHub project from your own Gitea instance, among many other things.
- ReverseCold 8y ago
  > star a GitHub project from your own Gitea instance How do federated networks prevent someone from making a few hundred accounts and starring/liking a bunch of posts?
  - r3bl 8y ago
    Does it need to prevent them? Do stars in a repo represent something significant?
  - OJFord 8y ago
    How does a centralised network prevent someone from making a few hundred accounts and starring/liking a bunch of posts? We seem to be doing OK by not caring much.
    - Rjevski 8y ago
      Well in this case why Github, GitLab, etc.. do not allow you to "star" a repo more than once? I'm fine with stars not being significant, but it's still not good if a malicious actor can suddenly spoof hundreds of accounts and spam stars, comments and what-not.
      - OJFord 8y ago
        Because that's a completely different interaction. You can still create another account and star it again. Sure, your IP will be rate-limited (GH at least) if you script it and start hammering stars, but that's not because it wants to protect the integrity of the repo star count.

by mikece 8y ago

deleted 8y ago

[deleted]

Arkanosis 8y ago

GitPub (or whatever it'll be named then) does not intend to replace git or any other VCS. Its stated goal is to enable federation between services such as GitHub, GitLab, Gogs, Gitea, Pagure… which happen to use git. In other words, it means that if GitPub was adopted by these services, you could submit a merge request from Pagure to Gitlab, or star a GitHub project from your own Gitea instance, among many other things.

ReverseCold 8y ago
> star a GitHub project from your own Gitea instance How do federated networks prevent someone from making a few hundred accounts and starring/liking a bunch of posts?
- r3bl 8y ago
  Does it need to prevent them? Do stars in a repo represent something significant?
- OJFord 8y ago
  How does a centralised network prevent someone from making a few hundred accounts and starring/liking a bunch of posts? We seem to be doing OK by not caring much.
  - Rjevski 8y ago
    Well in this case why Github, GitLab, etc.. do not allow you to "star" a repo more than once? I'm fine with stars not being significant, but it's still not good if a malicious actor can suddenly spoof hundreds of accounts and spam stars, comments and what-not.
    - OJFord 8y ago
      Because that's a completely different interaction. You can still create another account and star it again. Sure, your IP will be rate-limited (GH at least) if you script it and start hammering stars, but that's not because it wants to protect the integrity of the repo star count.