3 ms·
This is just not true. The discussion is about the syntax (.arc vs yaml), not the information it contains.
by stingraycharles 8y ago
This is just not true. The discussion is about the syntax (.arc vs yaml), not the information it contains.
- devxpy 8y agoexactly
- brianleroux 8y agoit's precisely true; but I get your gist. if you enjoy writing that much cloudformation then by all means have a good time!
- stingraycharles 8y agoI don’t think you get my gist about syntax vs information. I can express the same data in a different format, in the same way that JSON and YAML can often be transformed into each other. You are pulling a straw man by implying that requires much cloudformation, which is completely unrelated. Besides, CF is a good example of how you can use two different syntax to describe the same information.
- abiox 8y ago> I don’t think you get my gist if so, leading with "just not true" contributed to this (which seems like a non-sequitur if you're not saying the claim is false)
- motogpjimbo 8y agoThe format of a configuration file has no relation to the output of the program that parses it. Why are you being so obtuse about this? Your three-line arc file would be a three line YAML file. Stop doubling down on this nonsense.