3 ms·

Which point precisely do you disagree with and how do you support that view? Simply saying somebody is wrong is easy.

• syshum 8y ago
  All of it, the idea that we "debate then pass" Regulations have been proven to be false by more than a few studies where by it has been shown the public opinion has almost no impact on what laws and regulations actually get passed or not. The idea that we had some kind of philosophical debate and from that we choose that business should "lightly" regulated as no connection to reality or how business regulations actually came about in history nor would I classify today's business regulations as "light" I also disagree that there are "good reasons" behind the health codes when large part of them are passed not for health reasons but for Protectionist reasons to keep out new entrants into the market (see my comments on Food Trucks as an example of this) One would have to be a ardent supporter of Authoritarianism to believe that we have anything remotely approaching freedom in modern society, that goes for any nation. yes some nations are more oppressive than others, and places like the EU and the USA may be among the most free nations when compared to the others, but that does not make them "Free", just means they are less oppressive. What people identify as freedom today is not freedom at all