3 ms·
> ... so they should be more risk averse. It lessens risk, but doesn't eliminate it, so the original question still stands: what does happen when the $300 lice
by ben509 8y ago
> ... so they should be more risk averse.
It lessens risk, but doesn't eliminate it, so the original question still stands: what does happen when the $300 license holder poisons someone?
- DanBC 8y agoThe victim sues and gets a pay out for their losses from the food vendor's public liability insurance that is a requirement of the licence.
- loeg 8y agoRequiring liability insurance is entirely orthogonal to the cost of the business license. A locality could hand out business licenses for free and require liability insurance.
- learc83 8y agoYou seem to be forgetting the whole point of this thread--a proposal for $10 licenses that kids can afford. There's no point in making a license affordable for kids if they still need to have completely unaffordable liability insurance. It's pretty clear that when the OP suggested a $10 license they were also suggesting removing other regulatory costs. The proposal is useless otherwise.