I thought of a nice analogy. Do you also think this article should have been written in extremely ornate calligraphy? With the letters forming little animals a

I thought of a nice analogy. Do you also think this article should have been written in extremely ornate calligraphy? With the letters forming little animals and demons like in an illuminated manuscript? Maybe you find that idea ridiculous, which is my intention. You might think that the particular font used is irreverent compared to the words themselves. If someone used such an ornate font as to render the words unreadable that may seem self-defeating on the authors part. That is analogous to using such ornate language as to render ones meaning unclear. It is the content, the information and ideas generated in the readers mind that are important, not the font used, or the words used.