> That begs the question: Why then do they oppose the rules if only to start engaging in the practices they prohibit? Isn't it because title 2 imposes a heavie

> That begs the question: Why then do they oppose the rules if only to start engaging in the practices they prohibit? Isn't it because title 2 imposes a heavier regulatory burden than just net neutrality rules? Congress should just pass a net neutrality bill without using title 2 imho.