2 ms·
The information is there. Nothing you've said in your responses have been remotely realistic.
by kadenshep 8y ago
The information is there. Nothing you've said in your responses have been remotely realistic.
- RobertRoberts 8y agoI will take the bait, answer me this, is this equation true or false? C > D I propose to you that you do not have enough specific information to answer this question, even if you had a PHD in mathematics.
- kadenshep 8y agoBut no one is talking about that kind of problem. We have the information. You're using an extremely contrived example just to make a point. One might even call it a straw man. I just prefer the term dishonest based on current online discourse. This was already pointed out by another extremely patient commenter.
- RobertRoberts 8y ago>We have the information... No, actually you don't. _That_ is the problem. Here's the original comment I responded to: --- >How is the average American going to figure out what the truth is? Basic education that was provided for free in middle and high school? --- This person's comment is that a simple black and white "basic education" solves the problem of "how is the average American going to figure out the truth?" I disagreed with my initial comment stating that, education is simply not enough. I have a good friend with a PhD, and he's believed some incorrect things before, and I showed him more data, and he agreed he was wrong. So, no, just "having an education" doesn't automagically allow anyone to determine the "truth" of a matter.