4 ms·
I feel like this isn't going to go anywhere- after all, you can't prosecute someone based on vague tweets and a witness (Arrington) that felt awkward. It's pos
by gkoberger 16y ago
I feel like this isn't going to go anywhere- after all, you can't prosecute someone based on vague tweets and a witness (Arrington) that felt awkward. It's possibly a few of the "uncomfortable" Angels will step forward with more evidence, but I'm not convinced there's enough evidence to make a real case out of it.
But then again, all I really know comes from TechCrunch blog posts.
- houseabsolute 16y agoAll depends on whether what's come out so far is enough to convince a judge to issue subpoenas.
- netcan 16y agoEvidence for many (maybe most) cases is gathered at the interrogation stage. The larger the group the likelier it is that an investigation involving talking to the people there will uncover everything. Cops can be good at their jobs.
- andreyf 16y agoI would have thought that top VC's would be smart not to say a word about this that isn't vetted by their lawyers. Except maybe Dave McClure :-P
- andreyf 16y agoErr, the other obvious explanation is that whoever was at these meeting really don't have anything to hide, and Arrington is grossly exaggerating the few anonymous tips he's gotten.
- etm117 16y agoNot only that, you would be amazed at how many people who have done something wrong end up with a guilty conscience and just tell the truth. Especially if there was something wrong going on here and the FBI hangs the "first to tell me what happened won't be prosecuted".
- cletus 16y agoYou can however investigate based on such evidence. There are at least 10 people involved. Each of them can be interviewed and they will have extensive cell phone records, email, personal correspondence and financial transactions that can be subpoenaed.