2 ms·
> I was not thinking about romanticizing rural poverty This is why I led with “but yeah”. I am agreeing with you. > two career couples trying to keep the fami
by jacobolus 8y ago
> I was not thinking about romanticizing rural poverty
This is why I led with “but yeah”. I am agreeing with you.
> two career couples trying to keep the family housed in a world where you can't afford to have a full-time parent at home really need yet one more reason to feel like failures who just aren't trying hard enough.
Living in San Francisco, we know many couples who need to keep both parents working and would love to take much more time off work to raise their kids if they could afford it, but also many couples who have plenty of extra cash and still keep both parents working and offload child-rearing to nannies or daycare or grandparents, sometimes it seems because the parents just have no idea how to interact with children or would rather stay at the office. (Maybe that’s unfair; just my anecdotal impression.)
It is definitely a great luxury that I can stay home with my kid while my wife works full time. But taking care of a kid is also pretty time consuming and emotionally demanding.
- DoreenMichele 8y agoNot arguing here either. Just taking the opportunity to add another detail that I felt I failed to clearly state in my original comment. I'm here to make conversation and sometimes that back and forth exchange sounds like arguing when I in no way mean it to.