4 ms·
> biggest things you can do for your privacy is ad-blocking / cookie cleaning Very true. But there is no problem with apple, in fact Safari is first browser th
by auslander 8y ago
> biggest things you can do for your privacy is ad-blocking / cookie cleaning
Very true. But there is no problem with apple, in fact Safari is first browser that is clearing cookies - ITP(2). I use uBlock Origin on Safari and Private browsing - no cookies at all.
- IncRnd 8y agoFirefox has been able to clear cookies like that for years without any extensions.
- systoll 8y agoFirefox has an option to block all third party cookies in the manner similar to Safari 1-10's default behaviour. And like everything else, it lets you clear all cookies at once, or manually look through the cookies to clear them. It does not have a feature analogous to safari 11+'s tracking prevention.
- majewsky 8y agoWhat about the tracking prevention that Private Mode has had since FF 42 or so?
- systoll 8y agoFirefox’s tracking protection is the same feature as Safari’s content blockers. [the defaults differ, though], and prevents specific listed domains from loading anything. Except when it turns out blocking them breaks too much. Like Youtube embeds. Safari’s tracking prevention applies to things that do wind up getting loaded, and limits access to their own cookies/context. [kind of like loading all those embeds in seperate private sessions, even though they're on the same page]
- IncRnd 8y ago> It does not have a feature analogous to safari 11+'s tracking prevention. I never said that it did... I wrote that firefox has had the ability to block cookies automatically for years, which it has had. My response was not a comparison between the browsers but a statement of one particular feature that was mentioned. I simply said that what had been stated by the gp was also available in Firefox.
- systoll 8y agoWhen you wrote 'like that', I assumed that you meant 'like that'. > I simply said that what had been stated by the gp was also available in Firefox. Given that the gp referred to ITP... no, it's not.
- IncRnd 8y agoThe gp has clarified their comment, since that time. Snark is beneath you.
- auslander 8y agoUsind default settings or manually?
- IncRnd 8y agoNeither. It's an option in the preferences.
- auslander 8y agoIs that option enabled in default installation of firefox? Sorry, I must have specified that in Safari ITP is enabled by default, and this is important for non-tech people.
- IncRnd 8y agoNo. It hasn't been enabled by default in my experience. It isn't the exact same as the Safari technology. Firefox lets you block "3rd party cookies" or "all cookies" from the privacy pane of preferences. I've always "set it and forget it". The assumption is that many tracking cookies will come from 3rd party websites.
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]
- systoll 8y agoThe default is 'allow everything' You can change a setting to block third party cookies. This gets you similar treatment of cookies as was the default in safari 1-10. Safari 11 still blocks third party cookies by default, but has 'Intelligent Tracking Protection' as an additional filter on top of it. ITP blocks/limits certain uses of first-party cookies. Firefox has no analogous option. Either cookies are off, or all uses of first party cookies are allowed.