It's been repeated multiple times, not targeting the weak low quality journals (which, I agree, can likely be done to any field) but the top journals. If the P

It's been repeated multiple times, not targeting the weak low quality journals (which, I agree, can likely be done to any field) but the top journals. If the Piltdown man had been published in the journal Science, that'd be more analogous. Some of the criticisms levied by post-modernism are valid, but if the best journals can't distinguish between it and a Markov chain, we have a problem of low information content.