I thought what was being discussed was: "The real sciense[sic] should contain ONLY the things which are proved with real proofs!" As in mathematical proofs. Y

I thought what was being discussed was: "The real sciense[sic] should contain ONLY the things which are proved with real proofs!" As in mathematical proofs. You can't prove most things the way you can in mathematics, which is rock-solid through tautologies and self-consistent abstract models. When you are observing actual reality you have to make some assumptions.