> Are you really saying that making non-consensual porn just such a deep biological need that nothing can be done? I think what he is saying is that if you ban

> Are you really saying that making non-consensual porn just such a deep biological need that nothing can be done? I think what he is saying is that if you ban pornography, the only people who can make it will be criminals---and criminals will commit further crimes as (a) there is no psychological barrier to them doing so and (b) their 'consumers'/'customers' are already consuming illegal material, so can unsurprisingly further fetishize criminal behavior. It would be better/easier to allow for pornography but strictly regulate it to a degree that incentivizes the moral production of it.