the "private entity entitled to their decisions" argument is facing an interesting 1st ammendment challenge based on a 1946 court case Marsh v. Alabama https:/

the "private entity entitled to their decisions" argument is facing an interesting 1st ammendment challenge based on a 1946 court case Marsh v. Alabama https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marsh_v._Alabama https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marsh_v._Alabama It may not hold up after all, i.e. facebook censoring users because they are a private entity, they may be forced to provide some avenue for people to do so in the future. Its interesting to me because it goes against everything I use to believed in, but at the same time these entities are being used to promote a dark globalist agenda.