3 ms·
Read my other post. Be grateful. https://amasad.me/grateful https://amasad.me/grateful
by amasad 8y ago
Read my other post. Be grateful. https://amasad.me/grateful https://amasad.me/grateful
- rectang 8y agoI enjoyed reading both posts very much! Thank you for writing them. The line about "survivorship bias" also jumped out at me as out of place. It's probably a phrasing thing, but I think granting that survivorship bias could be a factor, even as you assert that it is not a dominant factor, would have made the piece stronger. The way it was phrased seemed to deny the possibility, causing me to raise an eyebrow in skepticism, but that doesn't seem to be what you believe. I absolutely agree with your central thesis that open source can provide a ladder for the underprivileged. At the same time, it's also undeniable that some people are constrained from contributing to open source due to economic and social circumstances, and I don't think those two ideas conflict. Does that make sense?