7 ms·

A concise abstract of Talebs last book can be found here https://www.theguardian.com/books/2018/feb/25/skin-in-the-game-by-nassim-nicholas-taleb-digested-read h

A concise abstract of Talebs last book can be found here https://www.theguardian.com/books/2018/feb/25/skin-in-the-game-by-nassim-nicholas-taleb-digested-read https://www.theguardian.com/books/2018/feb/25/skin-in-the-ga... Besides the problems I have with Taleb I'm happy that the OP had the courage to quit his job and that it worked out. Courage is a good charater trait, and in this case it got rewarded.

deleted 8y ago
[deleted]
jimnotgym 8y ago
That's really well written. I didn't know a lot about Taleb until I saw his attack on (now Dame) Professor Mary Beard on Twitter. I have genuinely never seen anyone so arrogant, he lead an attack on her understanding of the ethnicity of Romans in the UK. Mary Beard is a renowned classics scholar at Oxford, and the attack went along the lines of "You know nothing compared to me because I'm a black belt in probability". He had one study that showed little residual DNA to suggest that there were black Romans in Britain. She had a Hackernewsesq response 1) We know one of the Roman governors was from Africa, but don't know his ethnicity 2) Maybe [something about recessive genes I think] the DNA aged out of the record 3) Maybe most of the Romans went home at the end of the occupation!!!!!!! This one made me think of that Feymnan trait of complete skepticism. Taleb seemed to struggle with the idea that there is not much firm proof of anything that happened in Roman Britain, but not having firm evidence to back up your claim doesn't make you wrong. It seemed to me, and this is only an impression, that the main problem Taleb had with her is that she was a woman, and a smart one too.
- niklasd 8y ago
  After having seen Talebs Twitter feed, I can't take him serious. He might have (had) some good ideas, but I find it really hard to trust the judgment of a person who berates others on Twitter (e.g. he calls Pinker a charlatan) and think hes the only genius around. And it also seems that people like Pinker don't take him serious anymore (which seems to aggravate him even more). PS: http://quixoticfinance.com/empty-statistics/ http://quixoticfinance.com/empty-statistics/ talks about the Taleb-Pinker feud and rebukes Taleb.
  - swanson 8y ago
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tone_policing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tone_policing
  - tcbawo 8y ago
    He strikes me as the sort of person that loves confrontation. He's a raging narcissist, but he's also brilliant and highly opinionated. I find that I often disagree with him, but I appreciate his perspective. I don't much like when he bullies people in a public forum, since his followers will continue to harrass those individuals.
  - sheepmullet 8y ago
    > but I find it really hard to trust the judgment of a person who berates others on Twitter Feuds between intellectuals have been a staple for decades. You are letting personality problems obscure insights.
    - niklasd 8y ago
      Not so sure about that. I'm using a heuristic method. Since I'm not a statistics expert and sometimes can't properly assess Talebs statements, I ask myself: "Can I trust the judgement of this person?". Looking at the way he feuds with others (feuds between intellectuals don't all include crude insults), I feel that a person with proper judgement wouldn't behave that way. The same goes for his academic standing, which seems to be poor. These are two red flags. This said, that doesn't mean he won't offer insight. It just that since I don't have time to read everything, I'll use my heuristic method to look for potential places for insight. In this case it would rather lead me to Pinker et al.
      - sheepmullet 8y ago
        > I feel that a person with proper judgement wouldn't behave that way. Then my question to you would be why do you feel that? Is it based on evidence? Many of the worlds greatest scientists and philosophers have been jerks e.g. Aristotle was a massive sexist. Or look at the long list of geniuses who were unstable like Galois. Taleb has always put his money where his mouth is - to me that's a better indicator than poor manners.
- svat 8y ago
  Here's Taleb's longer article about the Roman Britain TV cartoon: https://medium.com/east-med-project-history-philology-and-genetics/something-is-broken-in-the-uk-intellectual-sphere-7efc9a1f154a https://medium.com/east-med-project-history-philology-and-ge... And here's an article about the debate/noise: https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2017/08/dna-romans/535701/ https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2017/08/dna-roma... Beard's point seems to be that ethnic and geographic diversity of some sort did exist and the kind of thing portrayed in the show is not entirely impossible, while Taleb's point seems to be that a family of “black” and “white” people would not be a typical one and that these modern racial categories are different from those of the time. The Atlantic article puts this in context and says why the positions are not inconsistent.
- sheepmullet 8y ago
  > but not having firm evidence to back up your claim doesn't make you wrong. Talebs point is the public is being mislead by taking an incredibly unlikely scenario and treating it as likely and common. Mary's rebuttal was that it's not an impossible scenario.
  - Tycho 8y ago
    He had an additional objection which was that the portrayal of Mediterranean diversity through the choice of a black (sub-saharan) character was extremely condescending - like "if you're not white European, we'll just pick some random dark skinned ethnicity to represent you, doesn't matter, the important point is non-white."
swanson 8y ago
"Concise abstract"...I don't know. It's a parody with a mocking tone penned by a comedy writer. It's funny; but it's an uncharitable summary if you're going to use that as a basis for evaluating Taleb's ideas.
- niklasd 8y ago
  True. But from the parody you very quickly get the idea what kind of person Taleb is, and the text kind of summarises my feelings towards him, so I find it concise. But you should of course take it with a grain of salt, since I used this word itself to mock Taleb, implying that his work can be summarised in a short Guardian parody piece.

deleted 8y ago

[deleted]

jimnotgym 8y ago

That's really well written. I didn't know a lot about Taleb until I saw his attack on (now Dame) Professor Mary Beard on Twitter. I have genuinely never seen anyone so arrogant, he lead an attack on her understanding of the ethnicity of Romans in the UK. Mary Beard is a renowned classics scholar at Oxford, and the attack went along the lines of "You know nothing compared to me because I'm a black belt in probability". He had one study that showed little residual DNA to suggest that there were black Romans in Britain. She had a Hackernewsesq response 1) We know one of the Roman governors was from Africa, but don't know his ethnicity 2) Maybe [something about recessive genes I think] the DNA aged out of the record 3) Maybe most of the Romans went home at the end of the occupation!!!!!!! This one made me think of that Feymnan trait of complete skepticism. Taleb seemed to struggle with the idea that there is not much firm proof of anything that happened in Roman Britain, but not having firm evidence to back up your claim doesn't make you wrong. It seemed to me, and this is only an impression, that the main problem Taleb had with her is that she was a woman, and a smart one too.

niklasd 8y ago
After having seen Talebs Twitter feed, I can't take him serious. He might have (had) some good ideas, but I find it really hard to trust the judgment of a person who berates others on Twitter (e.g. he calls Pinker a charlatan) and think hes the only genius around. And it also seems that people like Pinker don't take him serious anymore (which seems to aggravate him even more). PS: http://quixoticfinance.com/empty-statistics/ http://quixoticfinance.com/empty-statistics/ talks about the Taleb-Pinker feud and rebukes Taleb.
- swanson 8y ago
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tone_policing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tone_policing
- tcbawo 8y ago
  He strikes me as the sort of person that loves confrontation. He's a raging narcissist, but he's also brilliant and highly opinionated. I find that I often disagree with him, but I appreciate his perspective. I don't much like when he bullies people in a public forum, since his followers will continue to harrass those individuals.
- sheepmullet 8y ago
  > but I find it really hard to trust the judgment of a person who berates others on Twitter Feuds between intellectuals have been a staple for decades. You are letting personality problems obscure insights.
  - niklasd 8y ago
    Not so sure about that. I'm using a heuristic method. Since I'm not a statistics expert and sometimes can't properly assess Talebs statements, I ask myself: "Can I trust the judgement of this person?". Looking at the way he feuds with others (feuds between intellectuals don't all include crude insults), I feel that a person with proper judgement wouldn't behave that way. The same goes for his academic standing, which seems to be poor. These are two red flags. This said, that doesn't mean he won't offer insight. It just that since I don't have time to read everything, I'll use my heuristic method to look for potential places for insight. In this case it would rather lead me to Pinker et al.
    - sheepmullet 8y ago
      > I feel that a person with proper judgement wouldn't behave that way. Then my question to you would be why do you feel that? Is it based on evidence? Many of the worlds greatest scientists and philosophers have been jerks e.g. Aristotle was a massive sexist. Or look at the long list of geniuses who were unstable like Galois. Taleb has always put his money where his mouth is - to me that's a better indicator than poor manners.
svat 8y ago
Here's Taleb's longer article about the Roman Britain TV cartoon: https://medium.com/east-med-project-history-philology-and-genetics/something-is-broken-in-the-uk-intellectual-sphere-7efc9a1f154a https://medium.com/east-med-project-history-philology-and-ge... And here's an article about the debate/noise: https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2017/08/dna-romans/535701/ https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2017/08/dna-roma... Beard's point seems to be that ethnic and geographic diversity of some sort did exist and the kind of thing portrayed in the show is not entirely impossible, while Taleb's point seems to be that a family of “black” and “white” people would not be a typical one and that these modern racial categories are different from those of the time. The Atlantic article puts this in context and says why the positions are not inconsistent.
sheepmullet 8y ago
> but not having firm evidence to back up your claim doesn't make you wrong. Talebs point is the public is being mislead by taking an incredibly unlikely scenario and treating it as likely and common. Mary's rebuttal was that it's not an impossible scenario.
- Tycho 8y ago
  He had an additional objection which was that the portrayal of Mediterranean diversity through the choice of a black (sub-saharan) character was extremely condescending - like "if you're not white European, we'll just pick some random dark skinned ethnicity to represent you, doesn't matter, the important point is non-white."

swanson 8y ago

"Concise abstract"...I don't know. It's a parody with a mocking tone penned by a comedy writer. It's funny; but it's an uncharitable summary if you're going to use that as a basis for evaluating Taleb's ideas.

niklasd 8y ago
True. But from the parody you very quickly get the idea what kind of person Taleb is, and the text kind of summarises my feelings towards him, so I find it concise. But you should of course take it with a grain of salt, since I used this word itself to mock Taleb, implying that his work can be summarised in a short Guardian parody piece.