2 ms·
It's not actually. This book argues for the position that expert advice is wrong more often than not: https://www.amazon.com/Wrong-us---Scientists-relationship
by repolfx 8y ago
It's not actually. This book argues for the position that expert advice is wrong more often than not:
https://www.amazon.com/Wrong-us---Scientists-relationship-consultants/dp/0316023787/ref=sr_1_5?ie=UTF8&qid=1466016267&sr=8-5&keywords=wrong https://www.amazon.com/Wrong-us---Scientists-relationship-co...
The dubious reliability of much advice presented in the media as expert advice is one of the impending themes of our time. Expect skepticism about "experts" (defined as the sort of people who we tend to be told are experts when debating matters of politics, wealth or health) only to increase in the coming years.
The Swiss National Bank themselves, who will be put in charge of all lending if this is implemented, say this is a bad idea
The Overton window of acceptable thought in central banking is laughably narrow. Central bankers should really be the last people who are listened to on changes to how the monetary system works - they will always argue for minor changes to the status quo.