3 ms·
Hi, I am the author of Polyaxon, a bit late to notice, but thanks for sharing Polyaxon here. I will be around to answer questions, and any feedback is welcome.
by mmq 8y ago
Hi, I am the author of Polyaxon, a bit late to notice, but thanks for sharing Polyaxon here. I will be around to answer questions, and any feedback is welcome.
- mallochio 8y agoThanks a bunch for taking the effort to create this, and for making it open source.! The project looks amazing. Could you maybe also explain what the target audience is? Are there any benefits for using Polyaxon in (solo) research projects on a cluster, or is it tailored towards production-ready environments at corporations?
- mmq 8y agoI think the target audience, is individuals or small teams who want to have an organized workflow, immutable and reproducible experiments with an organized and easy way to access logs and outputs. The platform also provides a lot of automation to schedule concurrent experiments. There are a couple of things that need to be polished to be used, notes on experiments, notification of finished experiments, especially if you are running hundreds of experiments. Depending on how organized you are, many times you will end up with experiments that you did not know how you started, having a platform that takes care of that could be beneficial. If you have already a cluster, for running your experiments you will most probably end up ssh-ing to the machine to check which experiments finished, probably in a screen, and their results and logs, Polyaxon simplifies that part as well.
- jorgemf 8y agoThis is all the reasons why I want to use your tool. Thanks for creating it and I hope one day soon to contribute to your project.
- Peteris 8y agoCan you talk about how your product is different from Databricks MLFlow?