2 ms·
> Hopefully the US military will be able to upgrade the nuclear triad in time to maintain MAD and eliminate this potential threat. I consider MAD to be a great
by daltonlp 8y ago
> Hopefully the US military will be able to upgrade the nuclear triad in time to maintain MAD and eliminate this potential threat.
I consider MAD to be a greater threat. We are talking about extinguishing all human life.
Some reference material:
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/16884.The_Making_of_the_Atomic_Bomb https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/16884.The_Making_of_the_...
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/6452798-command-and-control https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/6452798-command-and-cont...
Just recently published:
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/25663779-the-doomsday-machine https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/25663779-the-doomsday-ma...
> But I think the best solution would be for the entire G7 to develop independent MAD systems so there's never any doubt that it remains in effect.
Comprehensive MAD would be a wonderful thing, if you had utter certainty that the chance for accidental launch was zero. If the chance is nonzero, you've put a time limit on civilization. How long? A hundred years? Three hundred?
You refer derisively to "1950s-era" technology. And you have a point. I'm agreeing with that point, and using it to make the case for a real chance of accidental nuclear war based on flawed or worn-out technology.
The third book in the list above goes into stark detail about the other danger - that of nuclear war based on flawed human decision-making.