Well, those actually seem totally different from what I'm getting at. I think people who understand Richard can still have valid arguments about his positives a

Well, those actually seem totally different from what I'm getting at. I think people who understand Richard can still have valid arguments about his positives and negatives as a leader etc. I can't tell quickly skimming those threads (even their context) whether these are people with real understanding bringing up particular reasonable complaints in just absurdly hyperbolic fashion or whether they are ignorant people with invalid criticisms. Either way, the comments aren't of the simple style where they just say that RMS thinks X and are factually wrong.