3 ms·
I don't think thats really true. In my experience its far more common to run memcached on a separate server (or servers, it is clusterable) than it is to run it
by russell_h 16y ago
I don't think thats really true. In my experience its far more common to run memcached on a separate server (or servers, it is clusterable) than it is to run it locally, at least for anything serious enough to require separate web and database servers.
- jacquesm 16y agoI can see four different scenarios here: - local box - same rack, or at least not further than one hop away on a switch - same datacenter (multiple switches) - somewhere on the net I would expect the first two to give good performance, the third adequate and the fourth too slow to be usable, and unreliable to boot.