3 ms·
FWIW I didn't even consider my OP in this thread to be ideological in any way. The only judgement I made in it was that I hoped it would end before too much da
by Consultant32452 8y ago
FWIW I didn't even consider my OP in this thread to be ideological in any way. The only judgement I made in it was that I hoped it would end before too much damage was done. Maybe it's ideological to claim that China stealing our defense tech is part of our trade war? It doesn't matter though, I'll try to be more careful. Additionally, the GP post claiming you are biased is distasteful and even if I thought you were biased that kind of nastiness is not a good way of handling it. Sorry that happened. I appreciate your work.
- dang 8y agoIf you mean https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17274168 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17274168, that one was more unsubstantive than ideological. I was referring to the pattern of your comments overall ("primarily"). That's the more important thing we look at in terms of how we moderate HN, as I've explained in previous comments: https://hn.algolia.com/?sort=byDate&dateRange=all&type=comment&storyText=false&prefix=false&page=0&query=by:dang%20primarily https://hn.algolia.com/?sort=byDate&dateRange=all&type=comme.... Thanks for the nice reply in any case!