4 ms·
I presume that the context of those accuracy numbers is prediction for the next period (i.e. 8 minutes, 10 minutes, 1 minute). To me 60% sounds good, but appare
by anjc 8y ago
I presume that the context of those accuracy numbers is prediction for the next period (i.e. 8 minutes, 10 minutes, 1 minute). To me 60% sounds good, but apparently not to people in this thread :)
- fwdpropaganda 8y ago> I presume that the context of those accuracy numbers is prediction for the next period (i.e. 8 minutes, 10 minutes, 1 minute). That's not a context. That's the statistic they're calculating. > To me 60% sounds good, but apparently not to people in this thread :) What does "good" mean, and compared to what? If you can't put a number on "good" you're flying blind. But hey, I'm just trying to warn people that the maths are garbage here; but if that looks good enough for you go ahead and trade it.
- mirekrusin 8y agoRandom generator has 50% prediction accuracy. For series like ether where price globally/on average was rising, constant predictor of “will rise” would have similar accuracy.