4 ms·

I've seen various sites in compliance, mostly smaller companies TBH. It seems to be mostly US companies who seem to be getting it completely wrong (maybe that's

I've seen various sites in compliance, mostly smaller companies TBH. It seems to be mostly US companies who seem to be getting it completely wrong (maybe that's biased by the sites I frequent), which has perplexed me a little as it would have been cheaper to just do nothing about it at all. I'm also wondering if the cookies thing is actually just the other law, but now we're all having to look at the old "we use cookies" notifications in a GDPR light.

Silhouette 8y ago
The irony is that the rules about annoying cookie notifications were supposed to be fixed by some additional changes that came into effect with the GDPR, but those changes weren't ready in time.
- kristofferR 8y ago
  Interesting, do you have a link where I can learn mire about the fix?
  - ma2rten 8y ago
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EPrivacy_Regulation_(European_Union) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EPrivacy_Regulation_(European_...
    - Fnoord 8y ago
      That Wikipedia page seems out of date, and there's only that one and a Dutch version of it, it seems. ePR should get in effect in 2019, correct?
      - Silhouette 8y ago
        ePR should get in effect in 2019, correct? Yes, that seems to be what they're aiming for now. It was originally supposed to come into effect alongside the GDPR last month, repealing the analogous ePrivacy Directive that was (and for now remains) in force, and therefore allowing member states to update their national laws to remove the annoying cookie notification requirements. Sadly, it wasn't ready in time.
- caffeine5150 8y ago
  The cookie banners are required by the ePrivacy Directive, not the GDPR or its predecessor, the Data Protection Directive. ePrivacy has been around for years. Directives are EU-wide “directives” to each member state (country) to enact their own version of it. Therefore, both ePrivacy Directive and the old Data Protection Directive resulted in varied laws from country to country making compliance a challenge. Part of the purpose of the GDPR was to create consistency by replacing a directive with an EU-wide regulation. They have the same plan for ePrivacy and already have published an ePrivacy Regulation for review and comment. The ePrivacy Regulation was supposed to be passed at the same time as the GDPR, but they’re behind so people are expecting it in 2019. There is a recognition that the cookie banners have been a failure, and it is expected the ePrivacy Regulation will get rid of them (but there will still be TBD consent requirements around use of cookies).
FRED400111 8y ago
When it comes to Hacking job , we are renowned for our jobs. We never delay services. we are certified hackers that can render many services!!! Get in touch with us today we render service such as:+University Grades changing >Erase Criminal Records hack >Driver License >Facebook hack, Twitter hack, Instagram hack, Gmail, Yahoo hack >Already hacked PayPal, MasterCard, Credit Card untraceable balance >Email interception hack >Hack computer remotely >Whats app hack .Email accounts hack >hack into any database >Bank accounts hack >Hack WORD-PRESS Blogs >Untraceable IP and all degree of hacking. Contact >> cyberclonehackers01@ gmail .com

Silhouette 8y ago

The irony is that the rules about annoying cookie notifications were supposed to be fixed by some additional changes that came into effect with the GDPR, but those changes weren't ready in time.

kristofferR 8y ago
Interesting, do you have a link where I can learn mire about the fix?
- ma2rten 8y ago
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EPrivacy_Regulation_(European_Union) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EPrivacy_Regulation_(European_...
  - Fnoord 8y ago
    That Wikipedia page seems out of date, and there's only that one and a Dutch version of it, it seems. ePR should get in effect in 2019, correct?
    - Silhouette 8y ago
      ePR should get in effect in 2019, correct? Yes, that seems to be what they're aiming for now. It was originally supposed to come into effect alongside the GDPR last month, repealing the analogous ePrivacy Directive that was (and for now remains) in force, and therefore allowing member states to update their national laws to remove the annoying cookie notification requirements. Sadly, it wasn't ready in time.
caffeine5150 8y ago
The cookie banners are required by the ePrivacy Directive, not the GDPR or its predecessor, the Data Protection Directive. ePrivacy has been around for years. Directives are EU-wide “directives” to each member state (country) to enact their own version of it. Therefore, both ePrivacy Directive and the old Data Protection Directive resulted in varied laws from country to country making compliance a challenge. Part of the purpose of the GDPR was to create consistency by replacing a directive with an EU-wide regulation. They have the same plan for ePrivacy and already have published an ePrivacy Regulation for review and comment. The ePrivacy Regulation was supposed to be passed at the same time as the GDPR, but they’re behind so people are expecting it in 2019. There is a recognition that the cookie banners have been a failure, and it is expected the ePrivacy Regulation will get rid of them (but there will still be TBD consent requirements around use of cookies).

FRED400111 8y ago

When it comes to Hacking job , we are renowned for our jobs. We never delay services. we are certified hackers that can render many services!!! Get in touch with us today we render service such as:+University Grades changing >Erase Criminal Records hack >Driver License >Facebook hack, Twitter hack, Instagram hack, Gmail, Yahoo hack >Already hacked PayPal, MasterCard, Credit Card untraceable balance >Email interception hack >Hack computer remotely >Whats app hack .Email accounts hack >hack into any database >Bank accounts hack >Hack WORD-PRESS Blogs >Untraceable IP and all degree of hacking. Contact >> cyberclonehackers01@ gmail .com