2 ms·
Both of those examples were effectively a religion-as-state with their state heads elevated to the status of gods. I don't think all that many non-religious pe
by lomnakkus 8y ago
Both of those examples were effectively a religion-as-state with their state heads elevated to the status of gods.
I don't think all that many non-religious people actually care/object when religious people practice their religion as long as it doesn't infringe on anyone else's rights.
- humanrebar 8y agoYou're defining "religion" broadly enough that some religions would be considered anti-religion.
- lomnakkus 8y agoHow so? These examples share a huge number of common traits with (fundamentalist) religion.